IPI International Potash Institute
IPI International Potash Institute

Research Findings: e-ifc No. 51, December 2017

Rice experiments on paddy soils of the hilly region of Hunan Province, China. Photo by authors.

Effect of Combined K and N Application on K Use Efficiency and Balance in Rice-Rice Cropping Systems in the Hilly Regions of Hunan Province, China

Lu, Y.H.(1)(2), Y.L. Liao(1)(2), X. Zhou(1)(3), J. Nie(1)(2)*, J. Xie(1)(2), and Z.P. Yang(1)(2)
print version pdf download pdf 926 kB

(1)Soil and Fertilizer Institute of Hunan Province, Changsha 410125, China
(2)Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Arable Land Conservation (Hunan), Ministry of Agriculture, Changsha, China
(3)College of Resources and Environment, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China
*Corresponding author: Jun Nie


A field experiment under a double-rice cropping system was carried out to study the effects of altered basal potassium (K) application rates (0, 105, and 150 kg K2O ha-1) using two nitrogen (N) rates (150 and 195 kg N ha-1) on rice yield, K uptake, fertilizer use efficiency, agronomic efficiency, soil K balance, and economic balance. The experiment was carried out on two types of paddy soil in the hilly regions of Hunan Province, China. The early crop yield increased slightly in response to the first increase in K rate, however, further yield increase was obtained only at the higher N rate. A similar response pattern was observed for the late crop on the red-yellow soil but not on the yellow soil, where the increase in N rate did not raise the rice yield. Potassium utilization rate was generally low, and it declined with increasing K rates. Potassium agronomic efficiency did not exceed 7 kg grain kg-1 K2O, it declined with increasing K rates but rose in response to an increase in N. Soil soluble K at harvest increased with K rates, however, no significant change was observed in soil exchangeable K. Economic analyses show that the combination of higher K and N rates was the most profitable choice for the early crop, while medium K and lower N rates were the best combination for the late crop. Altogether, these results show that K nutrition is still a focal problem of rice-rice production on paddy soils. They also indicate that the maintenance of soil K balance during the cropping season is the most critical challenge. One recommendation is to examine an alternative approach of splitting the K application rate along the season, to minimize K seepage. In addition, fertilizer management should be adjusted to local soil characteristics, and a suitable balance among soil macro- and microelements must be preserved.


Map. 1. Changsha and Hengshan Counties, Hunan Province, China. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org.

Map. 1. Changsha and Hengshan Counties, Hunan Province, China. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org.
click to enlarge

Hunan Province is located in the tropical region of Central Asia. Its climate is characterized as humid monsoon with abundant sunshine, heat and rainfall. The hilly region, comprising 29% of the total province area (Yang, 1989), is the main food production hub in Hunan Province. It possesses superior natural conditions for rice cultivation, usually as a double season crop grown on paddy soils.

Paddy soils are defined through their production environment; typically irrigated and rain-fed lowland rice-cropping systems. Paddy soils make up the largest anthropogenic wetlands on earth. They may originate from any type of soil in pedological terms, but are highly modified by anthropogenic activities. The formation of these Anthrosols is induced by tilling wet soil (puddling), and the flooding and drainage regime associated with the development of a plough pan and specific redoximorphic features. Redox potential oscillations due to paddy management control, microbial community structure and function, and thus short-term biogeochemical processes (Kögel-Knabner et al., 2010).

The increasing intensification of rice production in the region - involving improved varieties, high crop indices and yields, greater use of inorganic (mainly nitrogen [N] and phosphorus [P]) and organic fertilizers, and the growing tendency to remove straw for fuel, forage or just for the convenience of land cultivation - has put significant pressure on the potassium (K) resources of local paddy soils (Yadav, 1998; Wihardjaka et al., 1999). During the last 30 years, farmland soil fertility has been significantly degraded; imbalanced mineral nutrition under intensified rice production, augmented by high temperatures and intense precipitation regimes have led to severe soil K depletion. Therefore, most rice-rice production systems experience a negative K balance (Dai et al., 2000). Local farmers' practices still focus on heavy N application and tend to ignore crop K requirements, which leads to poor crop performance. Therefore, demonstrating the importance of K fertilization to obtain reasonable rice yields is still necessary, particularly in the rice-rice production system (Yadav, 1998).

In the present study, the effect of K application on yields and soil K status was examined in the hilly areas of Hunan Province using two N application levels in order to provide a scientific basis for a rational N and K management on paddy soils.

Materials and Methods

Table 1. The physical and chemical properties of the two paddy soils in the experiment

Table 1. The physical and chemical properties of the two paddy soils in the experiment
click to enlarge

Experimental site and basic soil traits

The experiments were conducted in Changsha and Hengshan Counties, Hunan Province.

Changsha County is characterized by red-yellow paddy soils developed from a quaternary red soil, while Hengshan County has yellow paddy soils developed from plate shale. Soil characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Experiment design

The experiment was conducted in 2012 and was comprised of successive early and late rice. There were six treatments: N1K0, N1K1, N1K2, N1K3, N2K0, and N2K3, as detailed in Table 2.

Most of the N fertilizer was applied at pre-planting for both the early (70%) and the late (60%) rice crops, and the rest was applied at tillering. Phosphorus and K fertilizers were applied at pre-planting.

  Table 2. A detailed description of fertilizer treatments.  
    Early rice   Late rice  
  Treatment N
    kg ha-1 kg K2O ha-1 kg ha-1 kg K2O ha-1 kg ha-1  
  N1K0 150 0 75   180 0 45  
  N1K1 150 105 75   180 136.5 45  
  N1K2 150 150 75   180 195 45  
  N1K3 150 195 75   180 253.5 45  
  N2K0 195 0 75   234 0 45  
  N2K3 195 195 75   234 253.5 45  

Seedlings of the early crop were transplanted in late April, at a row spacing of 13.3 x 20 cm, using the cultivars Zhejiang 7 and Weiyou 402, in Changsha and Hengshan, respectively, and harvested in early July. For the late crop, seedlings of the cultivars, Fengyuan Excellent 272 and Jade Incense 88, were transplanted at 20 x 20 cm spacing in late July in Changsha and Hengshan, respectively, and harvested in mid to late October. Each treatment included four repetitions of 20 m2 in a random block design.

Sample collection and analyses

Soil samples were collected from the 0-20 cm layer before the experiment (t0), and at the end of each early and late crop cycle. Soil total, soluble, and exchangeable K contents were determined using conventional analytical methods (Lu, 1999). At harvest, grain yield and aboveground biomass were determined. Samples of aboveground plant biomass were weighed, dried, and weighed again, ground to a fine powder and used for determination of K content (Lu, 1999).

Calculation and statistical analysis

Agricultural performance was evaluated using the following parameters:

K uptake: defined as the amount of K absorbed by the aboveground rice biomass (kg K2O ha-1).

K residue: calculated as the difference between K uptake and K application rate (kg K2O ha-1).

K utilization rate: calculated as: 100 • (KTreatment uptake - K0 uptake)/KTreatment dose (%).

Agronomic efficiency: calculated as: (KTreatment grain yield - K0 grain yield)/ KTreatment uptake (kg grain kg-1 K2O).

Statistical analyses were carried out using IBM SPSS 21.0 software.

Results and analysis

Effects of combined N and K application on rice yields

In both soil types, the highest cumulative grain yields were obtained under the highest combination of N and K application rates (Fig. 1). On the red-yellow soil, in the early crop, the increasing K rates hardly affected the yield under the lower N rate (yield increase ranging from 2.4 to 5.1%), while under the higher N rate, the yield increase was much greater (13.7%) and about 900 kg ha-1 more than the control. A similar pattern occurred for the late crop, although yield response to the K application under the lower N rate was more pronounced and ranged from 9.0 to 13.9%. In the late crop, yield response to the aggravated N rate was significant even when no K fertilizer was added, while the higher K rate made no further difference (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Effect of combined N and K treatments on early and late rice yields on two paddy soil types. Same letters indicate no significant differences at P < 0.05.

Rice yields on the yellow soil were generally higher than on the red-yellow soil, by 600 kg ha-1 per season, on average. Under the lower N rate, yield responded to the first grade of K rate, increasing by 10.3-12.4% and 12.9-17.7%, for the early and the late crop, respectively, but no further significant response could be observed when K rate was increased (Fig. 1). Upgraded N rate had a much smaller and not always significant influence on the yield.

Effects of combined N and K application on K balance on two paddy soils

Table 3. K uptake, balance, and agronomic efficiency in double-crop rice grown under combined K and N application on two paddy soils in the hilly region of Hunan Province, China.

Table 3. K uptake, balance, and agronomic efficiency in double-crop rice grown under combined K and N application on two paddy soils in the hilly region of Hunan Province, China.
click to enlarge

The total K uptake of both early and late rice crops increased with the rising K application rates (Table 3). Furthermore, K uptake consistently increased in response to rising N rates. Thus, K uptake was greater in treatments N2K0 and N2K3 than in the corresponding N1K0 and N1K3 treatments (Table 3).

Potassium uptake occurred under no K application, indicating considerable levels of soil available K, which seemed greater in the yellow than in the red-yellow soil (Table 3). The apparent K residue was negative under the lower K rates, especially for the later crops. Consequently, the K utilization rate was low, particularly in the early crop, ranging from 22 to 32% (Table 3). In the late crop, K utilization rate was considerably higher on the red-yellow soil, where it ranged from 36 to 65%, in comparison to the lower range of 10 to 25% on the yellow soil. The effect of N rate on K utilization rate differed between the early and late crops. While it had insignificant influence in the early crop, increased N rate brought about an increase in K utilization rate in the late crop (Table 3).

Potassium agronomic efficiency (KAE) was significantly higher on the yellow soil, compared with the red-yellow soil (Table 3). Under the lower N rate, KAE declined steeply with the rising K rate. Excluding the late crop on the red-yellow soil, KAE significantly rose in response to a higher N rate, as indicated by the KAE of N2K3, which was higher than that of N1K3 (Table 3).

Effects of combined N and K application on soil soluble K

Fig. 2. Effects of combined N and K application on soil soluble K contents in two paddy soils in the hilly region of Hunan Province, China. Empty, blue, and orange bars represent soluble K contents at the beginning of the experiment (K t0), after the early, and after the late rice crops, respectively.

Soil soluble K content at the beginning of each crop (t0) was higher than at the harvest of crops which had received the lower K treatments (K0 and K1). Soil soluble K displayed a linear positive response to K application rates and at rates equal to 150 kg K2O ha-1 or above, and it was much greater at harvest than at t0. This response pattern was similar for the two crops, being much clearer at the early crop (Fig. 2). Excluding the case of the late rice crop on the yellow soil, soil soluble K content at harvest was always higher at N2K3 than at the N1K3 treatment.

Effects of combined N and K application on soil exchangeable K

Fig. 3. Effects of combined N and K application on soil exchangeable K contents in two paddy soils in the hilly region of Hunan Province, China. Empty, blue, and orange bars represent exchangeable K contents at the beginning of the experiment (K t0), after the early, and after the late rice crops, respectively.

On the red-yellow soil, fertilizer applications had a minor influence on soil exchangeable K (Fig. 3). Even though, at the end of the early crop, increased K rates brought about a recovery of the basal situation. In the late crop, soil exchangeable K declined, and under the lower N rate, the effect of K rates was quite poor. However, under the higher N rate soil exchangeable K recovered and even slightly increased in response to the K3 treatment. On the contrary, soil exchangeable K was highly responsive to K application rates (Fig. 3). At the harvest of the early crop, soil exchangeable K increased by 32% in response to N1K2/K3 and reached 125 mg kg-1. Here, a higher N rate alone was sufficient for a substantial rise in exchangeable K, which further increased to 130 mg ha-1 in response to the K3 treatment. A similar response pattern occurred in the late crop under the lower N rate, nevertheless here, the rise of the exchangeable K in response to the higher N rate was not furthered by the K3 treatment (Fig. 3).

Economic considerations

Two principal parameters were used to evaluate the economic aspect of the examined fertilization practices: 1) the revenue:investment ratio (RIR); and, 2) the net increase in profit. RIR must be greater than 1, otherwise the farmer loses money. When this term is fulfilled, the profitability of each practice is compared to the alternative practices.

Table 4. Economic evaluation of combined N and K application on double rice cropping system in two paddy soils in the hilly region of Hunan Province, China.

Table 4. Economic evaluation of combined N and K application on double rice cropping system in two paddy soils in the hilly region of Hunan Province, China.
click to enlarge

In the early crop on the red-yellow soil, RIR was < 1 and the net profit was negative whenever N was applied at the lower rate (N1). Under those circumstances, N2K3 was the sole profitable treatment (Table 4). However, in the late crop on the same soil, the situation was different; here, a lower fertilizer combination, N1K2, yielded the highest profit. In this case, the highest yield or revenue did not necessarily indicate the highest profit.

Revenues were significantly higher on the yellow soil, especially for the late crop (Table 4). The net increase in profit was positive and RIR greater than 1 among all treatments. In the early crop, the highest net increase in profit was obtained for treatment N2K3, whereas N1K1 was the best treatment of the late crop.


Potassium is an important nutrient element required to achieve high and stable rice yields (Xie et al., 2000; Singh et al., 2002). A large number of studies have shown that K application in paddy soils can significantly increase rice yields (Liao et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2008). The present results may offer a more careful approach to K application regimes, ensuring they are suitable for the rice-rice system, and take into account differences between paddy soils and the interaction between N and K in this system.

Rice yields were consistently higher in response to the basic K application rate (105 kg K2O ha-1), compared to the non-fertilized control (N1K0). However, as long as the N rate remained at the lower level (150 kg ha-1), raising the K rate to 150 or 195 kg ha-1 resulted in no further increase in yield (Fig. 1). However, an increase of the N rate to 195 kg ha-1, accompanied with the highest K rate (195 kg K2O ha-1), gave rise to a significant yield elevation in most cases. These results raise some questions regarding the nutrient limiting rice growth and yield at each condition. Apparently, under the lower N rate, crop K demands are fulfilled by the basic K application rate and further K input might be wasted. At this point, additional N supply allows further crop development, reestablishing crop K demand.

The positive influence of the interaction between N and K on crop growth and development is well documented (Doberman, 2007; Buresh et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2011). The approach of 'high N with high K' may increase rice yield, as occurred for the early crop, nevertheless it might also lead to a significant waste of nutrients, as occurred in the late crop, with the obvious economic as well as environmental consequences. Optimizing nutrient application would, however, require a better understanding of the applied nutrient fate in the soil and the estimated nutrient use efficiency.

Experimental sites. Photos by authors.

Total soil K is roughly comprised of three fractions: soluble, exchangeable, and mineral K (Zörb et al., 2014). The soluble K fraction is comprised of K+ ions and is the one most available to plant roots. Exchangeable K represents the interphase between the liquid and solid phases of the soil. The K+ ions are adsorbed to the negatively charged surface of the soil particles, but can be quite rapidly released to the soluble fraction. Thus, exchangeable K acts as a reserve for soil available K, and the quantity stored is largely dependent on the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of local soil particles. The mineral K fraction is considered as a long-term reserve, which usually does not take part in the immediate soil K balance. Most K fertilizers enrich the soil with soluble K, which might be allocated between the liquid and the exchangeable fractions according to the chemical balance between the two at the temporary soil moisture content. Paddy soils display a unique type of rhizosphere, interchanging between wet and dry field conditions, when soils are continuously flooded during most of the rice-growing season and then drained during the non-cropping season (Yang, 1989; Doberman et al., 1996; Kögel-Knabner et al., 2010). In addition to the significant consequences of this pattern on soil structural, and chemical (Yang et al., 2004; Magahud et al., 2015) and microbial characteristics (Dong et al., 2014), soil K balance is especially affected (Doberman et al., 1996; Xie et al., 2000). Under flooding conditions, K fertilizer supplied at the beginning of the cropping season is predestined to four possible termini: soluble K; exchangeable K; crop uptake; and, seepage away from the field. In the early crop presented, the soluble K at harvest increased on both soil types with the rising K application rate, while the exchangeable K increased considerably only on the yellow soil (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). Early crop K utilization rates were relatively poor, at less than 35% in both soil types. Although significantly higher on the yellow soil, K agronomic efficiency of the early crop was generally low (Table 3), compared to published reports on paddy soils (Doberman et al., 1998; Ali et al., 2005; Buresh et al., 2010). This pattern was principally similar for the late crop, although K utilization rates were much higher for the red-yellow soil, and K agronomic efficiency was higher for the yellow soil (Table 3). These results suggest that large proportions of applied K were lost to seepage.

There is no doubt that significant rates of K application are a must for rice-rice cropping systems on paddy soils. The severe soil K deficiency caused by long-term non-application of K fertilizer in southern paddy soil has become one of the main limiting factors of high-yielding rice production (Xie and Zhou, 1995; Li et al., 1998). In recent years, soil fertility monitoring results revealed that soil available K content in southern paddy soil regions showed a decreasing trend, with an annual decline rate ranging from 0.58 to 3.32 mg K kg-1 year-1 (Xie and Zhou, 1995). At present fertilization levels, in spite of the prevailing 'balanced NPK approach', K status is generally in deficit, and in some areas the deficit is serious (Liao et al., 2007; Liao et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2010). In order to restore and maintain soil K fertility, soil K balance must be closely monitored. It is generally believed that the lower the soil K status, the more obvious the effect of K application is, and the higher the K utilization rate is (Wang, 2010). In the present study, however, yield response was highest for the lower K application rate but it did not increase further with rising K rates, unless N rate was also raised (Fig. 1). This, together with the evidence of significant K waste to seepage, highlights the need for significant improvement of K fertilization management.

Custom basal K application provides a short opportunity for K uptake by the crop, because plants are small, their root system has not fully developed yet, and soil soluble K is diminishing rapidly due to seepage. Alternatively, K application doses should be split during the cropping season, thus broadening the crop's opportunity windows for K uptake. Also, rice K demand changes according to biomass and stage of development; maximum rice yields were obtained where K had been applied from 25 to 50 days after planting (Ali et al., 2005). Potassium application regimes should therefore be adjusted to local soil characteristics, as shown previously (Zheng et al., 1989; Dai et al., 2000; Doberman, 2007; Buresh et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2010; He et al., 2015; Shivanna and Sheelarani. 2015), and demonstrated in the present study. Differences between cultivars in the rate of K uptake must also be considered (Fageria, 2015). While designing a new fertilization approach, a careful balance must be kept between K and the other macro- and microelements (Li et al., 1998; Doberman, 2007; Wang et al., 2011).

Economic evaluations in the present study show that a farmer's maximum profit from the early rice crop is obtained with high N and K application rates, while a lower N and K combination was sufficient for the late crop (Table 4). Nevertheless, the suggested alteration in K application regime is expected to change K utilization rate, K agronomic efficiency, and consequently the farmer's inputs and revenue. Hence, the economic aspect should be reconsidered after the new approach is established.


We thank Professor Sheng-xian Zheng from the Soil and Fertilizer Institute of Hunan Province for his work providing the basic soil data. We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the International Potash Institute (IPI). The work was also partially supported by the Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest of China (201203013).


  • Ali, A., M.S. Zia, F. Hussain, M. Salim, I.A. Mahmood, and A. Shahzad. 2005. Efficacy of Different Methods of Potassium Fertilizer Application on Paddy Yield, K Uptake and Agronomic Efficiency. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 42:1-2Z.
  • Buresh, R.J., M.F. Pampolino, and C. Witt. 2010. Field-Specific Potassium and Phosphorus Balances and Fertilizer Requirements for Irrigated Rice-Based Cropping Systems. Plant and Soil 335:35-64.
  • Dai, P.A., J. Nie, and X.H. Liu. 2000. Research on Nutrient Cycling and Balance of Farmland in Different Ecological Areas in Hunan Province. Farmland Nutrient Balance and Management. Proceedings of the 9th International Potash Symposium. Hohai University Press, 2000, p. 186-191 (in Chinese).
  • Doberman, A. 2007. Nutrient Use Efficiency - Measurement and Management. IFA International Workshop on Fertilizer Best Management Practice, Brussels, Belgium. p. 1-28.
  • Dobermann, A., K.G. Cassman, C.P. Mamaril, and J.E. Sheehy. 1998. Management of Phosphorus, Potassium, and Sulfur in Intensive, Irrigated Lowland Rice. Field Crops Research 56:113-138.
  • Dobermann, A., P.S. Cruz, and K.G. Cassman. 1996. Fertilizer Inputs, Nutrient Balance, and Soil Nutrient-Supplying Power in Intensive, Irrigated Rice Systems. I. Potassium Uptake and K Balance. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 46:1-10.
  • Dong, W.Y., X.Y. Zhang, X.Q. Dai, X.L. Fu, F.T. Yang, X.Y. Liu, and S. Schaeffer. 2014. Changes in Soil Microbial Community Composition in Response to Fertilization of Paddy Soils in Subtropical China. Applied Soil Ecology 84:140-147.
  • Fageria, N.K. 2015. Potassium Requirements of Lowland Rice. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 46:1459-1472.
  • He, P., L. Yang, X. Xu, S. Zhao, F. Chen, S. Li, and A.M. Johnston. 2015. Temporal and Spatial Variation of Soil Available Potassium in China (1990-2012). Field Crops Research 173:49-56.
  • Kögel-Knabner, I., W. Amelung, Z. Cao, S. Fiedler, P. Frenzel, R. Jahn, and M. Schloter. 2010. Biogeochemistry of Paddy Soils. Geoderma 157:1-14.
  • Magahud, J.C., R.B. Badayos, P. B. Sanchez, and P.C.S. Cruz. 2015. Levels and Sources of Potassium, Calcium, Sulfur, Iron and Manganese in Major Paddy Soils of the Philippines. International Journal of Philippine Science and Technology 8:1-8.
  • Lu, R.K. 1999. Methods of Chemical Analysis of Agricultural Soils. China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing.
  • Li, Z.P., Y.L. Tang, H. Shi, and K.L. Gao. 1998. Nutrient Cycling and Balance of Paddy Fields in Different Fertilization Systems in Red Soil Region of Subtropical China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 31:46-54 (in Chinese).
  • Liao, Y.L., S.X. Zheng, J.Y. Huang, J. Nie, J. Xie, and Y.W. Xiang. 2007. Effect of Potassium Application on its Efficiency and Balance in Double Rice Regions in Hunan Province. J. Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences) 33:754-759 (in Chinese).
  • Liao, Y.L., S.X. Zheng, J.Y. Huan, J. Nie, J. Xie, and Y.W. Xiang. 2008. Effect of Application of K Fertilizer on Potassium Efficiency and Soil K Status in Deficit K of Paddy Soil. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 24:255-260.
  • Liao Y.L., S.X. Zheng, Y.H. Lu, J. Xie, J. Nie, and Y.W. Xiang. 2009. Effects of Long-Term K Fertilization on Rice Yield and Soil K Status in Reddish Paddy Soil. Plant Nutrition Fertilizer Science 15:1372-1379 (in Chinese).
  • Singh, M., V.P. Singh, and D.D. Reddy. 2002. Potassium Balance and Release Kinetics Under Continuous Rice-Wheat Cropping System in Vertisol. Field Crops Research 77:81-91.
  • Shivanna, M., and S. Sheelarani. 2015. Macro and Micronutrients Status, Various Forms of Potassium and Correlation between Soil Properties and Forms of Potassium in Some Hilly Zone Paddy Soils of Hassan District of Karnataka. Environment and Ecology 33(1B):521-525.
  • Wang, Y.Y. 2010. Research on the Fertilizer Effect and the Dynamic Variation of Potassium in the Crop and Soil System. Wuhan, HuaZhong Agricultural University.
  • Wang, Y.Y., J.W. Lu, R.Y. Xiao, and X.K. Li. 2010. Study on Effects of Potassium (K) Fertilizer on Rice and K Balance of Paddy Fields in Different Types of Ecoregions of Hubei Province. Soils 42:473-478 (in Chinese).
  • Wang, W.N., J.W. Lu, Y.Q. He, X.K. Li, and H. Li. 2011. Effects of N, P, K Fertilizer Application on Grain Yield, Quality, Nutrient Uptake and Utilization of Rice. Chinese Journal of Rice Science 25:645-653.
  • Wihardjaka, A., G.J.D. Kirk, and S. Abdulrachman, and C.P. Mamaril. 1999. Potassium Balances in Rainfed Lowland Rice on a Light-Textured Soil. Field Crops Research
  • Xie, J.C., J.M. Zhou. 1995. Progress in Soil Potassium Research and Fertilizer Use in China. Soils 5:244-254 (in Chinese).
  • Xie, J.C., J.M. Zhou, and R. Haerdter. 2000. Potassium and Chinese Agriculture. Hohai University Press.
  • Yadav, R.L. 1998. Fertilizer Productivity Trends in a Rice-Wheat Cropping System under Long-Term Use of Chemical Fertilizers. Experimental Agriculture 34:1-18.
  • Yang, B., W.J. Ren, W.Y. Yang, T.Q. Lu, and Q.Y. Xiao. 2008. Effects of Applying Amounts of Potassium Fertilizer on Potassium Uptake and Utilization and Grain Yield in Rice under Different Planting Modes. Hybrid Rice 23:0-64.
  • Yang, C., L. Yang, Y. & Yang, and Z. Ouyang. 2004. Rice Root Growth and Nutrient Uptake as Influenced by Organic Manure in Continuously and Alternately Flooded Paddy Soils. Agricultural Water Management 70:67-81.
  • Yang, F. 1989. Soil Report of Hunan Province. National Agriculture Press. http://library.wur.nl/isric/fulltext/isricu_i26821_001.pdf.
  • Zheng, S.X., C.X. Luo, and P.A. Dai. 1989. Research on the Soil Supply and Potassium Capacity of the Main Paddy Fields in Hunan Province. Agricultural Sciences in China 22:75-82.
  • Zörb, C., M. Senbayram, and E. Peiter. 2014. Potassium in Agriculture-Status and Perspectives. Journal of Plant Physiology 171:656-669.
In your Language

Choose your Crop

Choose your App
IPI research e-ifc app for iPad and iPhone available now from the Apple App Store
IPI Research App for Android and Apple phones and tablets.

The Role of Potassium (K) in the Plant (in Urdu)
Potassium and Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) in Urdu
Potassium in Soil and Plant Systems (in Urdu)
IPI profile infographic
Chloride - an essential nutrient
Potassium and Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE)
Managing Water and Fertilizer for Sustainable Agricultural Intensification - infographic
Potassium Improves your Crop Quality
Potassium Improves your Health
Potassium in Soil and Plant Systems
The Role of Potassium (K) in the Plant
What does a Plant Need to Live
Assessment of the Impact of Targeted Use of Fertilizer on Irrigated Rice in Asia
The Role of Potassium (K) in the Plant (in Urdu)

New publication